Using the PERMA Model in the United Arab Emirates

Date
2016-02-01
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Abstract
Well-being theory, also known as the PERMA model (Seligman in Flourish: a visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being, Free Press, New York, 2011), proposes five pathways by which individuals can pursue happiness. The first pathway, the pleasant life, concerns the maximization of positive emotions. The second pathway, the engaged life, combines flow with engagement, while the third, the meaningful life, concerns purpose in life and meaning. The last two pathways involve positive relationships and achievements. While research in positive psychology focuses on happiness, there is a dearth of information within the literature about the ways in which the PERMA model is experienced by other cultures, and how it can highlight areas of development. This present study aimed to determine whether descriptions of happiness provided by a sample of Emirati university students would align with the PERMA model pathways. The results showed that the way in which happiness was described overlapped with the PERMA pathways in culturally consistent ways. The PERMA model was effective in highlighting opportunities and challenges for intervention in the United Arab Emirates. Finally, the study suggests that as researchers aim to increase well-being and as nations strive to improve the satisfaction of their citizens, cultural structures may be impacted. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Description
This article is not available at CUD collection. The version of scholarly record of this article is published in Social Indicators Research (2016), available online at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0866-0
Keywords
Arab, Development, Engagement, PERMA, Positive psychology, Well-being, culture, United Arab Emirates
Citation
Lambert D’raven, L., & Pasha-Zaidi, N. (2016). Using the PERMA model in the United Arab Emirates. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 905–933. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0866-0
URI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0866-0
 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12519/247
DOI
Collections
Department of Social Sciences